Michael Jackson remains an ardent topic among many people, who have nothing better to discuss than him and his pedophilia allegations. However, it's more than how it may innocently seem — these people seem obsessed with not only Jackson himself, but the pedophilia allegations against him. This is obvious by the amount of time they spend researching for and writing articles about him, manipulating and twisting the truth to their own brand of what happened. It seemed as though they have no moralistic value, writing, smearing, and branding Jackson as a pedophile no matter what the circumstance — Jackson is deceased, however for them, keeping the pedophilia allegations against him alive and not letting him rest, seems to be a paramount goal for them.
Who Are These Realists?
Most of Jackson's haters (as silly as it may sound), like to brandish themselves as "realists" (which sounds even sillier, if not worse), because they think that they speak the truth about Jackson, which his "fans" don't want to admit about him. These people think that they are somehow, doing the world a favor and doing something honorable by somehow "proving" a deceased man as a pedophile, as if it were to benefit anyone other than their own egoistic selves. If you have been researching about Michael Jackson, then you must have seen some of these realists' forms of media communication whether it's a website, YouTube channel, or even a forum.
Could you imagine dedicating a whole website, and not just that, but your own time, writing articles about how a pop singer who has been deceased for over ten years, was guilty of pedophilia? In actuality, aside from being obsessed with Michael Jackson, these people seem to be obsessed with pedophilia. Imagine having to look through Boys Will Be Boys, so you could write an article about how Jackson was a pedophile, because he owned it. Claiming that they are fact checking Michael Jackson's "stans", which means stalker-fans (Impossible to stalk Jackson because he is deceased; it's only possible to be a "fan"). These people constantly dwell themselves into the world of pedophilia, constantly reading about the allegations against Jackson, to the point where they are completely obsessed with pedophilia in of itself, aside from the Michael Jackson factor.
Why would anyone in their right mind make a whole website on how someone else was not innocent of a crime? Unless they are completely jobless and useless to society, then it would be normal, and make sense. These people seem to be obsessed with Michael Jackson completely, and it's impossible for them to admit they aren't part of an agenda or motive of some sort. At least if they were unbiased and did not have an agenda to uphold, then they would have been open to the slightest evidence which could have exonerated Jackson, but that's not the case. First of all, if Jackson were to be guilty, then it would not matter since he is already deceased. Why are they so stuck upon his alleged guilt, and proving it's existence? The simple answer would be, they have a campaign against him.
Here are some reasons behind why these websites are there about Jackson:
Calling themselves realist, doesn't make them people who are speaking of what is true. Jackson's name has way more dirt than it deserves because of most of these people's misleading words. For them, some books which Jackson owned, bed sharing, and child friendships are somehow evidence of pedophilia. Sure if you think deeper about it, without applying context and discreditory evidence, then it may seem criminal, which it wasn't. If you are thinking the whole entire day about pedophilia proof which ties in to Michael Jackson, and trying your best to prove that he was a pedophile, then that person is literally thinking about pedophilia all of their time, which is concerning. Think about it, there's a whole subreddit to discussing Michael Jackson (Leaving Neverland), and the allegations against him. This subreddit is no different than a Jackson hate website.
Why is there a need to hate on or prove that Jackson was a pedophile? Does it help anyone? Why aren't there websites on R. Kelly, or Jeffrey Epstein, or just about anyone else? It's just the one name; Michael Jackson. The gloved one's name attracts much attention from people, and warrants the suspicion of many. They do not care about children, or pedophilia occurring and being rampant in society — Jackson's 'realists' are not helping the children of the world, or protecting children from the crime of pedophilia by painting the deceased pop singer Michael Jackson as a pedophile. In that case, then why are all the child psychologists, or the anti pedophilia advocates, people who write about Michael Jackson on their website which so happens to be dedicated to calling him guilty? The reason is — they do not care about actual pedophiles, other wise they would've done so many other things other than write about Jackson.
Obsession With Pedophilia
The more constantly they engage in trying to write articles about Jackson (who they claim to not even like, let alone were they ever fans) and prove him guilty, while they are reading all about pedophilia. That leads to their complete and total obsession with the subject — it's one thing to defend Jackson who was an innocent man, however to try and prove that he was guilty of pedophilia, by comparing him to and reading more and more about pedophilia, only leads to an obsession with pedophilia.